Article quick-view

Research paper by

Morteza Zadimoghaddam

Indexed on

18th Apr 2017

Published on

18th Apr 2017

Published in

arXiv - Computer Science - Data Structures and Algorithms

This paper is not available for free

You can find the original article on the journal website.

Go to sourceWe study the problem of online weighted bipartite matching in which we want to find a maximum weighted matching between two sets of entities, e.g. matching impressions in online media to advertisers. Karp et al. designed the elegant algorithm Ranking with competitive ratio $1-\frac{1}{e}$ for the unweighted case. Without the commonly accepted Free Disposal assumption, it is easy to show that no competitive ratio can be achieved in the weighted case. However, under this assumption, it is not hard to show that algorithm Greedy is $\frac{1}{2}$ competitive, and this is tight for deterministic algorithms. After more than 25 years from the seminal work of Karp et al., it is still an open question whether an online algorithm with competitive ratio better than $\frac{1}{2}$ exists or not. We answer this question affirmatively by presenting randomized algorithm $\mathsf{StochasticGreedy}$ with competitive ratio greater than $0.501$. We also optimize this algorithm and propose slightly changed algorithm $\mathsf{OptimizedStochasticGreedy}$ with competitive ratio greater than $0.5018$. In light of the hardness result of Kapralov et al. that restricts beating the $\frac{1}{2}$-competitive ratio for Monotone Submodular Welfare Maximization problem, our result can be seen as an evidence that solving weighted matching problem is strictly easier than submodular welfare maximization in online settings.