The intermixed-blocked effect in human perceptual learning is not the consequence of trial spacing.

Research paper by Chris C Mitchell, Scott S Nash, Geoffrey G Hall

Indexed on: 16 Jan '08Published on: 16 Jan '08Published in: Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition


A robust finding in humans and animals is that intermixed exposure to 2 similar stimuli (AX/BX) results in better discriminability of those stimuli on test than does exposure to 2 equally similar stimuli in 2 separate blocks (CX_DX)--the intermixed-blocked effect. This intermixed-blocked effect may be an example of the superiority of spaced over massed practice; in the intermixed, but not the blocked exposure regime, each presentation of a given stimulus (e.g., AX) is separated from the next by the presentation of its partner (BX). Two experiments with human participants replicated the intermixed-blocked effect and showed that the effect was not due to the spacing of exposure trials. A mechanism for the intermixed-blocked effect is proposed, which combines theories from associative learning and memory.