Quantcast

Structural/surface characterization and catalytic evaluation of rare-earth (Y, Sm and La) doped ceria composite oxides for CH3SH catalytic decomposition

Research paper by Dedong He, Dingkai Chen, Husheng Hao, Jie Yu, Jiangping Liu, Jichang Lu, Feng Liu, Gengping Wan, Sufang He, Yongming Luo

Indexed on: 09 Oct '16Published on: 30 Aug '16Published in: Applied Surface Science



Abstract

A series of rare earth (Y, Sm and La) doped ceria composite oxides and pure CeO2 were synthesized and evaluated by conducting CH3SH catalytic decomposition test. Several characterization studies, including XRD, BET, Raman, H2-TPR, XPS, FT-IR, CO2-TPD and CH3SH-TPD, were undertaken to correlate structural and surface properties of the obtained ceria-based catalysts with their catalytic performance for CH3SH decomposition. More oxygen vacancies and increased basic sites exhibited in the rare earth doped ceria catalysts. Y doped ceria sample (Ce0.75Y0.25O2-δ), with a moderate increase in basic sites, contained more oxygen vacancies. More structural defects and active sites could be provided, and a relatively small amount of sulfur would accumulate, which resulted in better catalytic performance. The developed catalyst presented good catalytic behavior with stability very similar to that of typical zeolite-based catalysts reported previously. However, La doped ceria catalyst (Ce0.75La0.25O2-δ) with the highest alkalinity was not the most active one. More sulfur species would be adsorbed and a large amount of cerium sulfide species (Ce2S3) would accumulate, which caused deactivation of the catalysts. The combined effect of increased oxygen vacancies and alkalinity led to the catalytic stability of Ce0.75Sm0.25O2-δ sample was comparable to that of pure CeO2 catalyst.

Graphical abstract 10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.08.129.jpg
Figure 10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.08.129.0.jpg
Figure 10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.08.129.1.jpg
Figure 10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.08.129.2.jpg
Figure 10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.08.129.3.jpg
Figure 10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.08.129.4.jpg
Figure 10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.08.129.5.jpg
Figure 10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.08.129.6.jpg