Periprocedural anticoagulation management of patients with venous thromboembolism.

Research paper by Robert D RD McBane, Waldemar E WE Wysokinski, Paul R PR Daniels, Scott C SC Litin, Joshua J Slusser, David O DO Hodge, Nicole F NF Dowling, John A JA Heit

Indexed on: 09 Feb '10Published on: 09 Feb '10Published in: Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology


Patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE) often require temporary warfarin interruption for an invasive procedure. The incidence of thromboembolism and bleeding related to periprocedural anticoagulation management of such patients is unknown.In a protocol-driven, inception cohort design study, all VTE patients (n=775) referred for periprocedural anticoagulation management (1997-2007) were followed-up to estimate the 3-month cumulative incidence of thromboembolism and bleeding. Patients were stratified by thrombus acuity (acute, <30 days; subacute, 31-90 days; or chronic > or =91 days). Decisions to provide "bridging" low-molecular-weight heparin were based on estimated thromboembolism and bleeding risk. Low-molecular-weight heparin was more often administered in acute (87%) and subacute (81%) VTE compared to chronic VTE (59%; P<0.001). The 3-month cumulative incidence of thromboembolism (1.8%), major hemorrhage (1.8%), and mortality (1.7%) were low and did not differ by management strategy. Active cancer was the only independent predictor of thrombotic recurrence (HR, 4.86; 95% CI, 1.6-14.5; P=0.005), major hemorrhage (HR, 6.8; 95% CI, 2.1-21.7; P=0.001), and death (HR, 32.7; 95% CI, 4.3-251.2; P=0.0008).Thromboembolism, bleeding, and death among VTE patients in whom anticoagulation is temporarily interrupted for an invasive procedure is low. Cancer patients require particular care given their propensity for both clotting and bleeding.