“Overarching sustainability objectives overcome incompatible directions in the Common Fisheries Policy”

Research paper by Leyre Goti-Aralucea, Mike Fitzpatrick; Ralf Döring; David Reid; John Mumford; Anna Rindorf

Indexed on: 03 Mar '18Published on: 26 Feb '18Published in: Marine Policy


Publication date: May 2018 Source:Marine Policy, Volume 91 Author(s): Leyre Goti-Aralucea, Mike Fitzpatrick, Ralf Döring, David Reid, John Mumford, Anna Rindorf The lack of clarity in the objectives of the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP) must be addressed to create a more efficient balance across diverse ecological, economic and social dimensions. Particularly economic and social objectives present at an overarching level must be made explicit and addressed in lower level management measures, in order to link them to biological objectives and allow policy to build a balance across types of objectives. Selecting clear objectives is essential, particularly for policy impact assessment. The aim of this paper is to demonstrate how more specific high level objectives to managing fisheries can be derived from stakeholders. The paper first reviews the definition of objectives, from a historical and conceptual perspective. Secondly, it discusses the issues of manageability and acceptability, and finally describes an articulation of the high level objectives derived from extensive stakeholder consultations at European and regional level. The results from workshops at the European level to identify objectives were further examined at regional level for the Baltic and North Seas in additional individual consultations. The German case addresses two seas (Baltic and North Seas), has a complex governance structure (due to federalism) and significant roles for the three types of actors (industry, government and environmental NGOs). The analysis suggests that establishing higher level sustainability objectives within the CFP can help diverse interest groups to develop a consensus on management actions to meet complex social goals.