# On the Space of Convex Figures

Research paper by **V. V. Makeev, N. Yu. Netsvetaev**

Indexed on: **11 Jan '16**Published on: **11 Jan '16**Published in: **Journal of Mathematical Sciences**

Join Sparrho today to stay on top of science

Discover, organise and share research that matters to you

Join Sparrho today to stay on top of science

Discover, organise and share research that matters to you

Join for free

#### Abstract

Let T be the set of convex bodies in ℝk, and let T be the set of their similarity classes. If k = 2, then F is written instead of T. Ametric d on T is defined by setting d({K1}, {K2}) = inf{log(b/a)} for the classes {K1}, {K2} ∈ T of convex bodies K1 and K2, where a and b are positive reals such that there is a similarity transformation A with aA(K1) ⊂ K2 ⊂ bA(K1). Let D2 be the planar unit disk. If x > 0, then Fx denotes the set of planar convex figures K in F with d({D2}, {K}) ≥ x. In addition, the sets T and F are equipped with the usual Hausdorff metric. It is proved that if y > log(sec(π/n)) ≥ x for a certain integer n greater than 2, then no mapping Fx → Fy is SO(2)-equivariant. Let Mk denote the space of k-dimensional convex polyhedra and let Mk(n) ⊂ Mk be the space of polyhedra with at most n hyperfaces (vertices). It is proved that there are no SO(k)-equivariant continuous mappings Mk(n + k) → Mk(n). Let T s be the closed subspace of T formed by centrally symmetric bodies. Let Tx denote the closed subspace of T formed by the bodies K with d(T s, {K}) ≥ x > 0. It is proved that for each positive y there exists a positive x such that no mapping Tx → Ty is SO(k)-equivariant. Bibliography: 3 titles.