Quantcast

Interrater Reliability of the Structured Clinical Interview for the DSM-5 Alternative Model of Personality Disorders Module i: Level of Personality Functioning Scale.

Research paper by Tore T Buer Christensen, Muirne C S MCS Paap, Marianne M Arnesen, Karoline K Koritzinsky, Tor-Erik TE Nysaeter, Ingeborg I Eikenaes, Sara S Germans Selvik, Kristoffer K Walther, Svenn S Torgersen, Donna S DS Bender, Andrew E AE Skodol, Elfrida E Kvarstein, Geir G Pedersen, Benjamin B Hummelen

Indexed on: 08 Aug '18Published on: 08 Aug '18Published in: Journal of personality assessment



Abstract

The fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) presents an alternative model for personality disorders in which severity of personality pathology is evaluated by the Level of Personality Functioning Scale (LPFS). The Structured Interview for the DSM-5 Alternative Model for Personality Disorders, Module I (SCID-5-AMPD I) is a new tool for LPFS assessment, but its interrater reliability (IRR) has not yet been tested. Here we examined the reliability of the Norwegian translation of the SCID-5-AMPD I, applying two different designs: IRR assessment based on ratings of 17 video-recorded SCID-5-AMPD I interviews by five raters; and test-retest IRR based on interviews of 33 patients administered by two different raters within a short interval. For the video-based investigation, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) values ranged from .77 to .94 for subdomains, .89 to .95 for domains, and .96 for total LPFS. For the test-retest investigation, ICC ranged from .24 to .72 for subdomains, .59 to .90 for domains, and .75 for total LPFS. The test-retest study revealed questionable reliability estimates for some subdomains. However, overall the level of personality functioning was measured with a sufficient degree of IRR when assessed by the SCID-5-AMPD I.

More like this: