Indexed on: 20 Apr '10Published on: 20 Apr '10Published in: Academic Radiology
The aims of this study were to compare diagnostic accuracy between computed tomography (CT)-guided percutaneous cutting needle biopsy (PCNB) and surgery or open biopsy for thymic epithelial tumors in accordance with the World Health Organization (WHO) classification and to evaluate computed tomographic diagnosis additionally.Subjects were 20 patients (11 men, 9 women) in whom CT, CT-guided PCNB, and surgery had been performed for anterior mediastinal tumors. All diagnoses of both CT-guided PCNB and surgery or open biopsy were made in accordance with the WHO classification. Computed tomographic diagnoses were performed by two radiologists on the basis of radiologic characteristics previously reported according to the simplified WHO classification (types A and AB, type B1, types B2 and B3, and thymic carcinoma). The concordance of the WHO classification or the simplified WHO classification between the diagnosis on either CT or CT-guided PCNB and that on surgery was evaluated using the weighted kappa statistic.The histologic classifications on the basis of surgical resection specimens were as follows: type A, n = 3; type AB, n = 5; type B1, n = 3; type B2, n = 4; type B3, n = 4; and thymic carcinoma, n = 1. The overall concordance with the diagnosis according to the WHO classification established using CT-guided PCNB specimens (weighted kappa = 0.757) was higher than that using computed tomographic diagnosis (weighted kappa = 0.437).CT-guided PCNB is a technique with good concordance of the WHO classification of thymic epithelial tumors between the diagnoses of surgery or open biopsy.