Confirmation of the prevalence and importance of a 12-lead investigation for diagnosis of interatrial block [corrected].

Research paper by Mary E ME Frisella, David H DH Spodick

Indexed on: 30 Aug '05Published on: 30 Aug '05Published in: The American Journal of Cardiology®


We investigated 500 consecutive, unselected electrocardiograms of outpatients for interatrial block (IAB) using all 12 leads rather than the usual recommendation in the literature, which is lead II, sometimes with another lead. IAB had been reported in 2 widely separated large general hospitals in >40% of 1,000 patients in sinus rhythm in each. Because the P waves in IAB (duration > or =110 ms) generally have low amplitude despite their excessive width, we used magnifying graticules and, for greater specificity, a minimal duration of > or =120 ms. Four hundred sixty-nine patients remained after excluding those with atrial arrhythmias or technically poor tracing. Two hundred three of these patients (40.6%) had IAB. Had we used lead II alone, only 110 cases would have been identified, which would have meant overlooking almost 1/2 the cases with this lesion, which is important (1) as a predictor of atrial fibrillation and other arrhythmias, and (2) represents a large, dysfunctional left atrium. Leads V3 and V4 yielded larger numbers of IAB than lead II. (The slightly smaller prevalence than in the 2 cited studies may be due to our using 1/2 the number of patients.) Electrocardiographic interpreters should seek IAB in all 12 leads and consider its anatomic functional and predictive correlates.