An alternative approach to measure similarity between two deterministic transient signals

Research paper by Kihong Shin

Indexed on: 18 Mar '16Published on: 03 Mar '16Published in: Journal of Sound and Vibration


In many practical engineering applications, it is often required to measure the similarity of two signals to gain insight into the conditions of a system. For example, an application that monitors machinery can regularly measure the signal of the vibration and compare it to a healthy reference signal in order to monitor whether or not any fault symptom is developing. Also in modal analysis, a frequency response function (FRF) from a finite element model (FEM) is often compared with an FRF from experimental modal analysis. Many different similarity measures are applicable in such cases, and correlation-based similarity measures may be most frequently used among these such as in the case where the correlation coefficient in the time domain and the frequency response assurance criterion (FRAC) in the frequency domain are used. Although correlation-based similarity measures may be particularly useful for random signals because they are based on probability and statistics, we frequently deal with signals that are largely deterministic and transient. Thus, it may be useful to develop another similarity measure that takes the characteristics of the deterministic transient signal properly into account. In this paper, an alternative approach to measure the similarity between two deterministic transient signals is proposed. This newly proposed similarity measure is based on the fictitious system frequency response function, and it consists of the magnitude similarity and the shape similarity. Finally, a few examples are presented to demonstrate the use of the proposed similarity measure.

Figure 10.1016/j.jsv.2016.02.037.0.jpg
Figure 10.1016/j.jsv.2016.02.037.1.jpg
Figure 10.1016/j.jsv.2016.02.037.2.jpg
Figure 10.1016/j.jsv.2016.02.037.3.jpg
Figure 10.1016/j.jsv.2016.02.037.4.jpg
Figure 10.1016/j.jsv.2016.02.037.5.jpg
Figure 10.1016/j.jsv.2016.02.037.6.jpg
Figure 10.1016/j.jsv.2016.02.037.7.jpg
Figure 10.1016/j.jsv.2016.02.037.8.jpg